The short answer: use the lowest verified limit, then reconcile every downstream count.
Do not start with the number of desks or a centre's headline capacity. Start with the seats that are genuinely usable for one exam, room, date, and shift after unavailable positions, the approved layout, circulation, accessibility, equipment, and other verified constraints are considered. Compare that number with any lower limit imposed by the current examination owner, venue evidence, working-device count, or applicable authority. Then subtract the contingency deliberately chosen for that session.
Capacity planning is only the first control. Eligible enrolments, centre choices, confirmed assignments, numeric roll numbers, admit-card readiness, and roster records must reconcile to the same frozen version. A roster should be a controlled output with a visible version and audience—not an editable master spreadsheet passed between teams until nobody knows which copy is current.
Record the source, date, room, and owner behind every stated capacity, exclusion, cap, contingency, and readiness decision.
Build audience-specific operational views from one reviewed assignment state and mark every older copy as superseded.
Give centre and staff roles only the learner and operational fields they genuinely need for the assigned session.
Scope: This guide is designed for coaching-institute and internal mock-exam planning. When an institute hosts an examination for another owner, the owner's current centre instructions and applicable local requirements take priority. The guide is not legal, fire-safety, accessibility-certification, employment, data-protection, or examination advice.
Calculate a planning limit without uploading learner data
Enter aggregate seat and assignment counts only. The calculation runs in this browser and does not submit the values to Edugenie. Optional caps are included only when you enter them. The result is a planning check—not approval of the venue, layout, staffing, or exam operation.
Review each centre, room, and session outside the calculator
The blank worksheet adds rule sources, staff counts, access, exits, materials, roster versioning, roll-number and admit-card reconciliation, ownership, verification dates, and change-log references. It is a planning worksheet—not an Edugenie import or current roster export schema.
Privacy boundary: The worksheet is intentionally aggregate-only. Do not add learner or staff names, roll numbers, phone numbers, email addresses, addresses, dates of birth, payment references, credentials, diagnoses, disability details, or accommodation notes.
Connect supported centre records to roll numbers, admit cards, and roster data
Edugenie currently supports exam-centre records with state, city, address, capacity, and status; association of eligible centres with supported mock-test and test-series offerings; learner centre selection; supported offline schedule data; manual enrolment; numeric roll numbers for eligible test-series enrolments; admit-card PDFs using supported learner, exam, centre, and roll-number data; and centre-grouped roster data with course-level enrolment records.
Current product boundary: Capacity is an operational planning signal, not guaranteed overbooking prevention. Confirm the current roster download format during evaluation. Edugenie does not currently market automatic room or learner allocation, waitlists, seating plans, desk or seat-number generation, invigilator duty allocation, exam-day attendance or identity verification, SMS or WhatsApp notifications, QR or biometric workflows, OMR scanning, physical-paper evaluation, full remote proctoring, multi-branch exam control, or a complete ERP.
Primary references and review basis
These sources support the questions operators should verify. They do not approve Edugenie, certify a venue, create one universal coaching-exam rule, or replace the current instructions and professional review applicable to a specific examination.
- Ministry of Education: model guidelines for regulation of coaching centres — infrastructure, fire and building safety, lighting, ventilation, water, first aid, and emergency-information prompts. The model was sent to states and UTs for consideration; verify the applicable local framework.
- Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities: examination guidance hub — current notices and guidance relating to persons with disabilities. Verify the current exam-specific instruction rather than copying a fixed arrangement from another exam.
- University Grants Commission: examination-centre standards — a higher-education context for seating, exits, lighting, ventilation, facilities, water, fire equipment, and access checks; not a universal coaching-mock rule.
- Directorate General Fire Services: fire-prevention resources — evacuation, escape-route, and fire-safety planning materials that support venue questions without certifying a particular site.
- Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 — primary privacy sources with phased commencement; obtain current legal advice before defining roster notice, access, retention, or deletion controls.
- Guidelines for Indian Government Websites and Apps: accessibility — the basis for labelled controls, keyboard operation, visible focus, semantic tables, reflow, and status text that does not rely only on colour on this page.
Last reviewed: .
Resolve the operating rule—before releasing the roster.
Straight answers about usable capacity, contingency, staffing rules, roster privacy, Edugenie boundaries, seating plans, attendance, and OMR.
How should an exam centre calculate usable capacity?
Start with a documented stated or approved figure, subtract seats that are unavailable and seats excluded by the verified layout, accessibility, circulation, equipment, or other operating need. Compare that usable number with any lower exam-owner or working-device cap. The lowest applicable value is the planning limit before the institute's documented contingency.
What contingency or spare-seat percentage should an institute use?
There is no universal percentage in this guide. Choose a seat count for the specific exam, centre, learner group, rules, room constraints, staffing, accessibility arrangements, and failure scenarios. Record the reason, owner, approval, and conditions under which held seats may be released.
How many candidates should one invigilator supervise?
Do not copy a ratio from an unrelated examination. Use the current instruction of the examination owner and applicable local requirements. If no governing ratio applies to an internal mock, define and document a staffing rule based on rooms, sight lines, access needs, duties, breaks, conflicts, and backup coverage.
Is a candidate roster the same as a seating plan or duty roster?
No. A candidate roster identifies the learners assigned to a centre or session. A seating plan maps candidates to rooms or seats. A duty roster assigns staff roles and coverage. They should reconcile to the same approved session, but each has a different audience and privacy boundary.
What personal information belongs on a centre-day roster?
Use the minimum information authorised for identification and exam operation, commonly a roll or candidate reference and essential identifying details. Do not expose contact, payment, demographic, medical, disability, or accommodation detail unless a specific authorised role needs an operational instruction. Institute policy and applicable law determine the final field set.
Does Edugenie guarantee that a centre cannot be overbooked?
No. Edugenie stores centre capacity as an operational planning input, but end-to-end enforcement is not marketed as guaranteed overbooking prevention. Operators must still reconcile current centre facts, eligible demand, selections, assignments, changes, admit-card readiness, and roster counts.
Does Edugenie generate room seating plans or invigilator duty rosters?
No. Edugenie currently supports centre records, eligible offering assignment, learner centre selection, supported schedules, manual enrolment, numeric roll numbers, admit-card PDFs, and centre-grouped roster data. Room, desk, seat-map, invigilator allocation, attendance, QR, and biometric workflows are not currently marketed as supported.
Does Edugenie scan OMR sheets or evaluate physical answer papers?
No. Dependable OMR scanning and physical answer-sheet evaluation are not currently included. Automatic evaluation applies separately to supported online test attempts.